Growth, Development, and Yield of Spring Wheat in Artificial Climates

Spring wheat was grown to maturity in three growth rooms providing:(a) 18 h of light at 20° C and 6 h of darkness at 15°C (hot long days, HL); (b) 18 h of light at 15° C and 6h of darkness at 15° C (cold long days, CL); (c) 14 h lightat 20° C and 10 h of darkness at 15° C (hot short days,HS). Plants were moved between environments at spikelet initiationand anthesis, so dividing the growth period into three. Meanlengths in days of these periods in the different environmentswere: Period 1: HL 16, CL 18, HS 25; Period 2: HL 42, CL andHS 61; Period3: HL 53, CL 83, HS 63. The length of periods 2and 3 also depended on previous treatments. Grain dry weight was affected by environmental differences inall periods and effects in successive periods were additive.Compared with HL, CL or HS in period I before initiation increasedgrain yield by 6 per cent by increasing grain number per ear,HS in period 2 between initiation and anthesis decreased itby 24 per cent by decreasing the number of grains per spikeletand the proportion of spikelets that contained grain; CL inperiod 2 increased it by 21 per cent by increasing the numberof ears; CL in period 3 after anthesis increased it by 16 percent because leaves died later; HS in period 3 decreased itby 14 per cent because there was less radiation and hence lessphotosynthesis. Dry weight of shoot and root at maturity wasincreased by CL or HS in periods 1 or 2, and increased by CLand decreased by HS in period 3. The effects on final yieldof treatment during periods 1 and 2 were the consequence ofsimilar effects already produced at anthesis, and shoot androot dry weight changed little during period 3. The effects of environmental differences on grain dry weightcould not be explained by differences in leaf-area durationafter anthesis (D₃), except that CL in period 3 increased bothyield and D₃ but not proportionately, so that, as with HS inthe same period, grain: leaf ratio was decreased. Environmentaldifferences in periods 1 and 2 appeared to affect grain weightby altering the capacity of the ear to accumulate carbohydrates,determined by the number of grains per ear, rather than by alteringthe supply of carbohydrates, determined by D₃. There were some interactions between environments in differentperiods which were usually small compared with the main effects.     

The Nubian Past: An Archaeology of the Sudan

The Nubian Past: An Archaeology of the Sudan . David N. Edwards. New York: Routledge, 2004. 348 pp.     

Effects of Selected Herbicides on Plant Protoplasts

Plant protoplasts were released from immature tomato fruits by incubation with a 20% solution of polygalacturonase (Pectinol R-10, Rhom & Haas) dissolved in 0.1 M KCl + 0.1 M MgCl₂. In this salt solution the protoplasts remained stabilized for up to 8 h and were used as a source of exposed plasma membrane. Gross responses of protoplasts to selected chemicals and herbicides were recorded photomicroscopically. Paraquat (1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ion) treatments resulted in a characteristic response which was different from that of general denaturants (trichloroacetic acid, ethanol, and detergents) and of osmotic shock. Initial phases of the paraquat response were characterized by a segregation of the cytoplasm into isolated areas on the inner membrane surface. The final phase was a rupture of the plasma membrane and collapse of the cell. The herbicides, 2,4′-dinitro-4-trifluoromethyl-diphenylether (preforan); 1,1-dimethyl-3-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)urea (fluometuron); 3-(3-chloro-4-bromophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea (chlorbromuron); and α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N-N-dipropyl-p-toluidine (trifluralin) produced no apparent structural effect on the protoplasts.     

Cereal aphids, their parasites and predators caught in cages over oat and winter wheat crops

The trapping of alate aphids in emergence cages each 1 yd² (0–83 m²) over cereal crops from mid-June to the end of July, 1964 to 1971, always revealed colonies of cereal aphids within the crop. Four species, Sitobion avenae, S. fragariae, Metopolophium dirhodum and Rhopalosiphum padi occurred every year in different proportions. Alate aphids from winter wheat were most numerous in 1968 and fewest in 1967. Alatae developed slightly earlier in cages than in the field and peak catches were a few days earlier than in a nearby 12-2 m suction trap. Cereal aphid colonies were adversely affected by bad weather in May, e.g. in 1969, and by predators. Coccinellidae (chiefly Propylea 14-punctata) were the dominant predators in 1971 and 1968, Syrphidae in 1966, 1971 and 1968 and Chrysopidae in 1970. Parasites belonging mainly to the genus Aphidius were numerous every year. When hyperparasites such as Asaphes vulgaris, Lygocerus sp., Conostigmus sp. and Phaenoglyphis sp. were abundant as in 1967, they affected numbers of aphids in the current year and increased them in the following year (1968), possibly by hindering early, heavy parasitism. Hyperparasites could have an important influence in fluctuations of cereal aphid populations from year to year. Aphids of one species or another are always present in cereal crops in sufficient numbers during the summer months to provide copious quantities of honey dew, and this is unlikely to be a limiting factor in the biology of the wheat bulb fly, Leptohylemyia coarctata.